Dads' rights: the rise of firms for fathers going through divorce

I felt like i wasn’t going to have a existence,” says the 46-12 months-vintage who works as an hvac technician. “i heard such a lot of horror testimonies of divorce and the way pretty a good deal girls get all your paycheques and you haven't any manner to stay.”


jones (his final name was changed to shield the identification of his youngsters) represented himself in court docket whilst his wife hired an attorney who he says is “famous” of their north carolina county for “getting women whatever and the entirety they need in courtroom”. the attorney, he says “sort of offers you the sensation that she hates men. that all men are puppies and guys don’t want to be in their infant’s lives.


in family regulation, testimonies of fathers who pay exorbitant infant aid and seldom get to see their kids are commonplace. these days, firms focusing on guys’s divorce have popped up all over the united states to capitalize on so-referred to as gender-primarily based discrimination in courts. whilst many own family law companies have seen a drop in divorce filings, those area of interest legal professionals claim business is prospering.



but their very life if arguable. critics declare any exact legal professional is ready to handle a person’s divorce and that in preference to pushing for more equality beneath the law, these companies perpetuate sexist stereotypes approximately ladies.


the maximum common issues, he says, are that guys hardly ever get identical get admission to to their children and are often sufferers of fake abuse allegations. cordell estimates that eighty five% of transient restraining order requests at some stage in divorces are mere “processes”. margaret ryznar, an partner law professor at indiana university, says her research suggests a minority of ladies are trying to find protecting orders for the duration of divorce and that on account that home abuse is a he-said, she-said crime it’s often impossible to prove “who’s lying and who’s now not”.


kirby ingles, who lives in missouri, says he experienced bias in the course of the 2009 custody war for his 5-12 months-old son. his lawyer, who did now not specialise in men’s divorce, instructed him that the court docket judge might “most possibly lean closer to [your ex-wife’s] facet due to the fact the kid is five or six years vintage so needs their mom”. ingles desired extra custody and joint decision-making but was told this is how judges commonly rule. “they didn’t really need to do the paintings and put up a fight and do any digging inside the case,” he says.